Study on the efficiency of prefabricated walls of aerated concrete

Abstract

This research is a comparative study of the performance of precast concrete walls and cellular concrete cell walls. The researcher has made concrete samples of 200 × 60 × 10 cm high to be tested in 6 types normal concrete walls with regular reinforced concrete, lightweight cellular concrete walls with concrete walls and reinforced cellular concrete Cellular with coarse aggregate with a lightweight cellular concrete with reinforced steel coarse aggregate. Tested find unit weight Water absorption and impact resistance

The weight unit test results showed that Aerated concrete has a weight of 1600 kilograms per cubic meter. And cellulosic concrete with a gross aggregate weight of 1995 kg per cubic meter. The water absorption test showed that cellulosic concrete had a water absorption rate of 25.81 percent and cellular concrete with a gross cellulite content had a water absorption rate of 16.32 percent. The 50-kg weight of the pendulum is tested in accordance with TIS 2226 - 2005. The results of the comparison of the six types of wall showed that the aerated concrete with gross mass and mass concrete Obama cellular coarse aggregate with steel reinforcement. The highest deflection. Due to the internal texture of aerated concrete, cellulose is porous. There is no good aggregate adhesion. As a result, the cellulosic concrete with the coarse aggregate had the lowest compressive strength. The impact test results in the highest deflection values. Compared with standard TIS 2226 - 2005, it is found that the wall is in accordance with the standard, with a deflection of not more than 2 mm.