Weighed Score of Construction Drawing Software Selection Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Medium-Size Construction Company: A Case Study of Lhumkoon Company Limited

Abstract

Medium-sized construction companies often face challenges in selecting appropriate construction drawing software due to multiple considerations, including operational efficiency, ease of use, team coordination, and resource constraints. This study aims to analyze the weighted scores of factors influencing the selection of construction drawing software using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A case study was conducted on Lhumkoon Company Limited. The sample consisted of 6 executives and 12 operational staff, with separate analyses conducted for each group to reflect their differing perspectives. The findings revealed that the executive group prioritized time (34%) and quality (33%), while the operational staff placed higher importance on time (41%) and quality (24%), highlighting the influence of each role’s context. Furthermore, the study identified AutoCAD as the most suitable software, receiving total scores of 333.52 from executives and 392.91 from operational staff. These results reflect the practical constraints faced by medium-sized firms, such as limitations in personnel, budget, and hardware resources. The results from this research provide a practical guideline for decision-making in software selection and resource planning, supporting a potential transition toward the adoption of 3D construction software in the future.